BUREAUCRACY, AGAIN
I have some comments on bureaucracy and the Columbia disaster over at WoC. They may not be what you expect...
« January 2003 | Main | March 2003 »
I have some comments on bureaucracy and the Columbia disaster over at WoC. They may not be what you expect...
Here's what the Armed Liberal household packs in our cars:
OK, here are the contents of the first-aid kits we keep in the cars and house. Note that these are way too much for a simple accident; they are intended to support several people over several days and deal with a wide range of injuries and conditions.
...
I've got some thoughts about my almost-second country, France.
Our frustration with France comes from our (not unreasonable) assumption that a) since we keep bailing them out of military difficulties; b) we rebuilt their economy twice; and c) they lived under our military protection for twenty years, they would act as allies and assume that our interests were parallel, with small differences involving metric v. English measurement and whether we would sell Michelin or UniRoyal tires to various third-word accounts.They dont feel that way.
...
We're having a kind of a debate about France over at Winds of Change. I am letting it take me to a philosophical discussion (surprise!).
I'll suggest that morality and spirituality in politics is central and absolutely necessary, on one hand, and incredibly dangerous on the other. I'll follow with the assertion that the genius of the American Foundation was that it both provided a sphere for a politics centered on moral and spiritual values, and that it explicitly denied morality and spiritual values a seat at the political table.This was a brilliant bank shot which has led to the American genius of assimilation and to the cultural openness which has made us the dominant force in the world for over a hundred years.
Go read this very funny blog.
I hate golf, by the way.
So Tenacious G (my sweetie) and I went out for our pre-Valentines Day dinner last night. We have the boys Friday, and itll be a zoo everywhere, so we went to our favorite neighborhood bistro and had a nice dinner together.
Which was slightly spoiled by the conversation at the next table. Im usually pretty good at filtering, and too polite to acknowledge that Im eavesdropping (or reading your mail upside down on your desk), but this was just too much, in every sense of the word.
It was a first date. He was (from the conversation) about my age, but overweight, balding, and with a sunlamp tan and a ponytail a combination that I cant imagine the ladies could resist. Im commenting on his physical attributes (actually more his presentation of them) because they meshed so well with the personality that he displayed at dinner.
I kept one eye on my watch for a bit and at one point he talked over three minutes without stopping. I think she said about ten words in the entire hour and a half that we were there, and the conversation from their table never stopped.
They (he, actually) discussed Iraq. Hes against it, but he would have gone to Canada if his lottery number had come up during Vietnam and would personally drive his son to Canada today (in his Ferrari) if he was in any danger of serving in the military. We cant invade Iraq, he explained, because we havent defeated Al Quieda, and we havent made a settlement between the Israelis and Palestinians. Once we do those things, hed be open to considering it if it was OK with the U.N.
I have a discussion on his points over at Winds of Change.
He discussed work. Hes apparently a prosecutor, and he discussed how unfair the laws that he is sworn to enforce are, and how he practices his own form of jury nullification on cases that he thinks are just unfair.
He discussed (at painful length) his divorce, his lack of a relationship with his children, and his dysfunctional dating history.
He discussed his cars (a 70s Ferrari, a 60s Porsche, and a new BMW).
He discussed dancing, and the kind of music he likes. He went on a long riff about the sensuality of just moving your body to music i.e. he dances like a white guy.
So in 90 minutes, he did a kind of miniature Biography Channel special on himself.
There are so many problems here
Look, Ive never been a playa, but Ive certainly dated a bunch (TG would say more than a bunch) and met a bunch of neat women (even married a couple). Ive given some dating advice to my sons and to my more relationship-challenged friends (male and female, showing that theyll take advice from anybody). But it was all I could do not to turn around in my chair last night and go Stop. Stop now. Ask her something about herself, and let her complete her answer. Explore her interests. Hand her the keys to the conversation, because believe me at the rate this is going you arent going to be getting any tonight.
So let me offer some dating advice to my fellow middle-aged divorced guys:
Shut the fuck up.
Dont try and sell yourself, its boring and ineffective. Help her sell herself, and in doing so youll sell yourself far more effectively than you could otherwise.
Dont inventory your possessions, inventory your passions.
Dont recount, in real-time, the story of your failed prior relationships.
Dont talk down your exes.
Basically, dont assume that youre the only interesting person in the room.
And lose the damn ponytail.
Well, golly...
...it's funny how the things that I do that are just thrown out there seem to get the biggest responses; as opposed to the things I sweat over and worry about.
The note on dating, below, got more traffic than anything else I've ever posted; funny how that works. My kinda serious comments on American political history or on 'bug out kits' over at Winds of Change didn't get nearly the reaction. So I know what's important to you people...or what you think I might know anything about.
It got fairly widely linked, and then Instalanched, and as a result hopefully I will get to have some interesting dialogs with some new folks.
In other ego-preening news, I (or at least my pseudonym) got into The Atlantic!! In print!! Thanks to Media Minded for ferreting this out...I stood by the mailbox waiting for my copy for five days!!
If my mother knew I was doing this, she'd be so proud...
Speaking of dialogs, I'll be at the Blogging Event in Chinatown Saturday night; I'm looking forward to meeting some other blogfolks (Tenacious G is tolerant of it...).
It's Valentine's Day, and I just wanted to interrupt my normally scheduled blogging for a moment to publicly tell Tenacious G that I'm grateful every day that she's mine and that she's taken me and all my boys as hers.
Thank you, baby.
It's been a wonderful time with you, and I hope you'll be a part of my life forever.
Today's my birthday. It's a milestone one, so I managed not to tell anyone outside my immediate family or let them set up a party (we'll be having a big one in a few weeks) so I can just hang out and relax today, thinking good thoughts about everyone and everything in my life.
Then I realize that my house smells like a catbox and I have to close my eyes and work really hard to extend those charitable thoughts to our two semi-incontinent cats...I'm working on it...ommmm...
Over at Winds of Change, I've got a post on 'Risk' up.
I was, as usual, led there by my children...
Then it turns out that Tenacious G and the boys haven't seen the Branagh 'Henry V', so we jump it to the head of the Netflix queue, and it shows up in the mail. We watched it the other night, and it was still wonderful (Yes, Bacchus, I'm still supporting Branagh's erotic reward). My boys loved it as well; Littlest Guy, who is six, wanted to watch it again the next day, and spent the time after bath and before bed wandering the house in his blue PJ's-with-rocket-ships-and-feet and a stern look, declaiming "No King of England if not King of France." I love my sons and they are wonderful, but they are a bit odd, sometimes. Somehow that line over all the others had caught him, and he and I had a long discussion in which I explained that Henry wanted to be King of France, and that he was willing to risk losing England to get it.More to come.
My hometown...from today's Daily Breeze:
A Torrance stamp and coin shop dealer shot and wounded a would-be armed robber Thursday, prompting support from neighbors who said the criminal "picked the wrong guy" to hold up.The crime rate in Torrance (12.7/1000) is 43% of the rate in Los Angeles, and 75% of the rate in Beverly Hills.The 79-year-old owner, reportedly robbed three or four times in the past year, fired one shot at the gunman at 1:50 p.m., hitting him in the hip. The suspected robber, Joshua Edward Reyes, 20, of Torrance was booked at County-USC Medical Center jail ward in Boyle Heights, Torrance police Lt. Patrick Shortall said.
...
Shortall said the shooting appears to be a "robbery that was interrupted by the victim." Police will present their reports on the shooting to the District Attorneys Office to determine whether the shooting was self-defense.
The shooting was the second time in less than a year that a downtown Torrance business owner fired a gun at a robber.
...
..."robbery that was interrupted by the victim." Has kind of a good sound to it.
I have a correspondent who forwards me, using fake email addresses, stories about tragedies involving people hurting others with guns. I know, and we all know, about these because they are well-reported in the press.
In much of the country, stories like this one seldom get reported.
So, mystery correspondent, this one's for you.
Sorry for dropping out of sight like that; got another invite to go up to the mountains and ski with Tenacious G and Middle Guy, and took it...of course I got sick with la grippe Friday, and spent most of the weekend wrapped in a quilt on the sofa of my friend's condo.
I did get a half-day of skiing in, and managed a Warren Miller-worthy crash on Dave's Run. You know you've crashed well when, after you (finally) get to a stop, you hear a soft voice from above you going "Duuuude! You OK?"
So I had no Internet connection, but managed to read a couple of books (the new William Gibson, Pattern Recognition, and Jay Walters' and Dan Walter's great The Third House: Lobbyists, Power, and Money in Sacramento).
I'm back, will work on the 'Risk' stuff and catch up to all the world's events, plus all the comments.
With all that, a nice weekend...
My post on France is attracting lots of intelligent discussion from the French:
It's all bullshit ...And in French, this:
all of you, french, americans ...
We can talk about all the errors ours gouvernments made but ...
It's not the story.
The story is WAR ....
Murders, people dying ...
lots of death people ...
300.000 iraqian soldiers ...
and how many children ????
HOW MANY ???do you want another Vietnam war ?
It's all about politic, economical situation, ...
But we're talking about iraquians mens and womens who are, for the most part, innocents.
Indeed, all people, french too, are for changing iraquian gouvernment.
But please, NO WAR, we don't need it.
So ..... STOP SADDAM ... STOP BUSH ... !!!
ALLEZ TOUS VOUS FAIRE FOUTRE BANDES DE GROS BLAIREAUXA rough translation:
VIVE LA FRANCE! QUE CREVE BUSH ET TOUTE SON ADMINISTRATION NOYEE DANS SON PETROLE IRAKIEN
Go fuck yourselves, gang of the fat Blair! One who belives Bush and all his administration bathe in Iraqui gas.Both, unsurprisingly are from fake email addresses - "chirac@aimelafrance.com" and "salecond@meri.cain" (dirty, stupid @merican).
Look mes beaux types (dear guys), right now the U.S. is highly annoyed at France. There's going to be a war, and at the end of it, we'll either figure out how to be allies again ... or not. I'd like us to be allies, which is why I hammer Americans who make outrageous statements about France. I'd suggest that you will need American allies as well...and this m'emmerder (pisses me off).
This page contains all entries posted to Armed Liberal in February 2003. They are listed from oldest to newest.
January 2003 is the previous archive.
March 2003 is the next archive.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.